The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by relying on a connected judgment dated 2 September, 2026, without providing independent reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 28015 of 2026
CNR No.ODHC010655512026
Mukteswar Naik
…. Petitioner
Mr. Sukanta Kumar Dalai, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite parties
Mr. Saswat Das, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
ORDER
Order No.
01.
10.09.2026
1. In view of the judgment dated 2nd September, 2026 in
W.P.(C) No.27986 of 2026 ( Mukteswar Naik v. State of Odisha and
others ), the instant writ petition is disposed of in terms thereof.
(Harish Tandon)
Chief Justice
(Chittaranjan Dash) Judge
Sisira
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SISIRA KUMAR BEHERA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 11-Sep-2026 14:47:38
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mukteswar Naik v. State of Odisha and othersFollowed¶18
W.P.(C) No.27986 of 2026
Mukteswar Naik
State of Odisha
Harish Tandon
Chittaranjan Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Harish Tandon and Chittaranjan Dash
Parties & counsel
