The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner. No substantive legal principle or proposition was advanced or decided in this order, as it merely records the withdrawal of the matter by the counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.27021 of 2026(PIL)
CNR No.ODHC010623952026
Anita Rao & Ors.
…. Petitioners
Mrs. Reena Nayak, Advocate
-Versus-
…. District Magistrate Cum Collector, Opp. Parties Kataka & Ors.
Mr. Saswat Das, AGA
Mrs. Sujata Sahoo, Advocate For O.P.-4
CORAM:
HON’ BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
Order No.
ORDER 10.09.2026
01.
1. Mrs. Nayak, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners wants to withdraw the instant writ petition.
2. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Harish Tandon) Chief Justice
(Chittaranjan Dash) Judge
Signature Not Verified AK Pradhan/Priyanka
Digitally Signed Signed by: PRIYANKA BARIK Designation: JUNIOR STENOGRAPHER Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA , CU TTACK Date: 11-Sep-2026 15:25:40
Anita Rao & Ors.
District Magistrate Cum Collector, Opp. Parties Kataka & Ors.
Harish Tandon
Chittaranjan Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
