The High Court, considering the petitioner's submission on covered claims and opposing counsel's request, directed the senior counsel to produce specific engagement orders for future comparison before listing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP (C ) No.8936 of 2015 CNR No. ODHC010424762015
Krupasindhu Satpathy …. Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Das, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. D. Mohapatra, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. M.R . Pradhan, Adv. (for O.P. NO.2-WALMI)
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
09.09.2026
Order No.
8. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
// 2 //
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
sangita
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGITA PATRA Reason: authenticatoni of order Location: high court of orissa, cut tack Date: 10-Sep-2026 19:59:44
Page 2 of 2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
2015(I) OLR 347Referred¶14
Krupasindhu Satpathy
State of Odisha
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
