The single judge in Writ Petitions filed by Bhim Bahadur Gurung against the State of Odisha found service of notice on private opposite parties sufficient. The petition was disposed of by quashing the order under Annexures 6 & 7 in reliance on a prior judgment.
Quashing of the order under Annexures 6 & 7.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP (C ) Nos.22445,22482 & 22505 & 22512 of 2025 CNR No. ODHC010565052025
Bhim Bahadur Gurung …. Petitioner Mr. M.K. Khuntia, Adv. -versus-
State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. C.K.Pradhan, AGA Mr. M.K. Pati, Adv. (for O.P. NO.6)
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
09.09.2026
Order No.
6. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
// 2 //
Photocopy of the order be placed in the connected cases.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Sangita
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGITA PATRA Reason: authenticatoni of order Location: high court of orissa, cut tack Date: 10-Sep-2026 19:59:44
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition should be disposed of by quashing the order under Annexures 6 & 7 in light of a previous judgment.
Whether the service of notice on all private opposite parties was sufficient given the return of notice to some parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.(C ) No.7674 of 2025Referred¶6
Bhim Bahadur Gurung
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
