The single-judge bench of the High Court of Orissa, Cuttack, heard a writ petition involving service of notices on opposite parties. Relying on a previous batch judgment, the Court held service sufficient and quashed the order under Annexures 6 & 7.
Quashing of the order under Annexures 6 & 7.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP (C ) Nos.22445,22482 & 22505 & 22512 of 2025 CNR No. ODHC010565052025
Bhim Bahadur Gurung …. Petitioner Mr. M.K. Khuntia, Adv. -versus-
State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. C.K.Pradhan, AGA Mr. M.K. Pati, Adv. (for O.P. NO.6)
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
09.09.2026
Order No.
6. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
// 2 //
Photocopy of the order be placed in the connected cases.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Sangita
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGITA PATRA Reason: authenticatoni of order Location: high court of orissa, cut tack Date: 10-Sep-2026 19:59:44
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present Writ Petition is covered by the judgment passed in W.P.(C ) No.7674 of 2025 & batch.
Whether the service of notice on all private Opposite Parties is sufficient despite refusal by some.
Bhim Bahadur Gurung
State of Odisha & Others
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
