Sabita Naik v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioners counsel's submission that they did not wish to press the application.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.17267 of 2022
CNR No. ODHC010447642022
Sabita Naik
…. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India & Ors.
…. Opp. Parties Mr. P.K. Parhi, DSGI
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 09.09.2026
Order No.
02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that Petitioner does not want to press this application and he may be permitted to withdraw the same. The memo be kept in record.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sabita Naik
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court