Petitioner sought to withdraw writ petition and move appellate authority after filing the original petition six months previous, avoiding delay objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 15038 of 2023 CNR No. ODHC010360862023
Muralidhar Naik
..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Behera, Advocate
-versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA Mr. S. Das, Advocate (Opp. Party No. 3)
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
10.09.2026
Order No. 03
Page 1 of 2.
7.1. It is observed that if any such appeal will be filed within a period of within a period of three (3) weeks hence, the appellate authority shall entertain the same and decide the matter on merit without insisting on any delay.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge
Sneha
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 12-Sep-2026 12:55:29
Page 2 of 2.
Muralidhar Naik
State of Odisha
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
