Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Subash Ch.Samal Vs State and Ors. — Orissa HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Home
Orissa HC
2026
Subash Ch.Samal Vs State and Ors.Subash Ch.Samal v. State and Ors.

Dismissed

Subash Ch.Samal v. State and Ors.

Orissa HC9 Sept 2026WP(C)/1411/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition (WP No. 1411 of 2012) on the ground of no instruction from the client. Counsel for the petitioner was granted liberty to revive the matter by filing an application within four weeks if a cause of action subsists.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to revive the petition by filing an application within four weeks if cause of action subsists.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Liberty granted to revive the petition by filing an application within four weeks if cause of action subsists.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition was dismissed due to no instruction from the client. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to revive the matter by filing an appropriate application within four weeks from the date of the order, should any cause of action still subsist.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 1411 of 2012 CNR No. ODHC010065522012

Subash Ch. Samal

..... Petitioner

Proxy Counsel on behalf of Dr. C.R. Misra, Advocate

-versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA Mr. S. Das, Advocate (Opp. Party No. 2)

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

09.09.2026

Order No. 07

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.

Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that he has received no instruction from his client. However, liberty be granted to revive the same by filing appropriate application within a period of four (4) weeks from today, if any cause of action still subsists.

With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of no instruction.

Signature Not Verified

Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Reason: Authentication Sneha Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 12-Sep-2026 12:48:07

(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge

Page 1 of 1.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Subash Ch. Samal
respondent
State of Odisha

Coram

AI extract

BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 9 Sept 2026 · September
Registered: 24 Jan 2012
Case no.: WP(C)/1411/2012
CNR: ODHC010065522012
Disposal: Disposed Off

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

Cite this judgement

Subash Ch.Samal v. State and Ors., WP(C)/1411/2012 (OD), decided on 9 September 2026.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Parties & counsel