Dismissed
Osrtc v. Emp.Prov.Fund Appel
Orissa HCWP(C)/12807/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Orissa High Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution after repeated non-appearance by the petitioner (OSRTC), despite counsel appearing for respondents.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 12807 of 2012 CNR No. ODHC010024472012
¶2
OSRTC, BBSR
¶3
..... Petitioner None
¶4
-versus-
¶5
Employee Provident Fund ..... Opposite Parties Appellate Tribunal, N. Delhi & Mr. S.K. Das, Advocate Ors. (Opp. Party Nos. 2 & 3)
¶6
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
¶7
ORDER
¶8
10.09.2026
¶9
Order No. 05
¶10
- This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
¶11
- None appeared for the Petitioner when the matter was called. None had also appeared on 07.09.2026. Heard Mr. S.K. Das, learned counsel appearing for Opp. Party Nos. 2 & 3.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
OSRTC, BBSR
- respondent
Employee Provident Fund
- respondent
Appellate Tribunal, N. Delhi
- other
Mr. S.K. Das
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court