Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Trilochan Behera Vs State of Odisha — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2026)

Home
Orissa HC
2026
Trilochan Behera Vs State of OdishaTrilochan Behera v. State of Odisha

Dismissed

Trilochan Behera v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC9 Sept 2026WP(C)/12719/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.12719 of 2026

[CNR No. ODHC010267812026]

Trilochan Behera

Petitioner

Represented by Adv.– Mr. Aruna Nayak, Advocate

-Versus-

State of Odisha & Others

…. Opposite Parties

Represented by Adv._ Mr. Satyabrata Mohanty, AGA

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK AND

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN ORDER

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Trilochan Behera
respondent
State of Odisha

Coram

AI extract

Manash Ranjan Pathak

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 9 Sept 2026 · September
Registered: 24 Apr 2026
Case no.: WP(C)/12719/2026

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

Cite this judgement

Trilochan Behera v. State of Odisha, WP(C)/12719/2026 (OD), decided on 9 September 2026.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Manash Ranjan Pathak and Murahari Sri Raman

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn after petitioner obtained court permission to withdraw the proceedings by filing a memo.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Order No.

09.09.2026

(Hybrid mode)

01.

1. After arguing for some time, Mr. Aruna Nayak, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition by filing a memo in Court, which is taken record.

2. In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Manash Ranjan Pathak) Judge

(Murahari Sri Raman)

Judge

Narayan Signature Not Verified

Digitally Signed Signed by: NARAYAN HO Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 09-Sep-2026 17:20:01

Page 1 of 1

Murahari Sri Raman

CNR

ODHC010267812026

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Disposal

Withdrawn