In a hybrid mode matter, the High Court of Orissa refused the petitioner 's request to withdraw a revision petition. The order dismissed the revision petition as withdrawn, with a directive to communicate the outcome to the opposite party mother guardian for necessary action.
The revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No.410 of 2025 CNR No. ODHC010910572025
Srimukha Sahu
Petitioner
Mr. S.P. Dash, Advocate
-versus-
Lima Muduli & ors.
Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
11.09.2026
Order No.
04.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Mr. S.P. Dash, learned Counsel for the Petitioner prays for withdrawal of the revision petition and files a memo to the said effect in the Court, which is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Office is directed to communicate a copy of this order to the Opposite Party No.1, who is the mother guardian of Opposite Party Nos.2 & 3, for her information and necessary action.
(S.K. MISHRA)
JUDGE
Banita
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BANITA PRIYADARSHINI PALEI Designation: SR. STENOGRAPHER Reason: AUTHENTICATION Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 12-Sep-2026 15:31:52
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition should be allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed accordingly.
Srimukha Sahu
Lima Muduli
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
