Disposed
Premlal Putel v. Kumari Putel
Orissa HCRPFAM/221/2026
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No.221 of 2026
CNR No.ODHC010578552026
Premlal Putel
Petitioner
Mr. A. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
Kumari Putel
Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
09.09.2026 I.A. No.350 of 2026
Order No.
01.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. In view of the defect pointed out by the Stamp Reporter, this application has been filed for change of nomenclature from ‘RPFAM’ to ‘MATA.
3. Accordingly, the prayer made is allowed and the I.A. stands disposed of.
4. Office is directed to re-register the RPFAM as MATA, as prayed for.
(S.K. MISHRA)
JUDGE
PTO
Page 1 of 2
RPFAM No.221 of 2026
02.
1. In view of the order of even date passed in I.A. No.350 of 2026, after change of nomenclature from RPFAM to MATA and fresh stamp reporting is made, the matter be listed before the Bench having assignment, when moved.
(S.K. MISHRA)
Anisha
JUDGE
Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 2
Digitally Signed Signed by: ANISHA NANDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, CUTTACK Date: 10-Sep-2026 18:08:56
Premlal Putel
Kumari Putel
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
Anisha Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court