Disposed¶¶18
Gambhar Chhatria v. State
Orissa HCCRLREV/756/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Keywords: criminal revision maintainability; concurrent jurisdiction Sections 397 and 401 CrPC; default bail proviso (a)(ii) Section 167(2) CrPC; order dated 27.05.2006 Sessions Judge Bolangir/Balangir; order dated 16.05.2006 SDJM Sonepur; G.R. Case No.32 of 2006; informant; Petitioner-accused; no appearance for petitioner; High Court of Orissa at Cuttack; Justice V. Narasingh; disposed 19.02.2026; CRLREV No.756 of 2006.
What did the court decide?
The criminal revision is ex facie not maintainable because the learned Sessions Judge, Balangir, who has concurrent jurisdiction in terms of Sections 397 and 401 of the Cr.P.C., passed the impugned order. ¶¶15