Disposed¶19

Dillip Ku.Mallik v. Basumati Bidek@Mallik

Orissa HC19 Feb 2026CRLMC/3714/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Orissa High Court, Cuttack; CRLMC No. 3714 of 2016; Dillip Kumar Mallik v. Basumati Budek @ Mallik and Sibashankar Mallik; order dated 19.02.2026; Miss Justice Savitri Ratho; maintenance order challenge; SDJM Patnagarh CMC No. 01 of 2005 order dated 29.08.2016 (Rs.500/- p.m. wife, Rs.1,000/- son from 03.01.2005); Additional Sessions Judge Patnagarh Criminal Revision No. 07 of 2016 order dated 07.10.2016 (Rs.1,000/- p.m. son only); notice first issued 06.02.2023; no interim order; lapse of more than 9 years; CRLMC disposed of with liberty to revive if cause of action survives.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner for revival of the CRLMC in case the cause of action still survives. ¶19

Dillip Ku.Mallik Vs Basumati Bidek@Mallik — Orissa HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No. 3714 of 2016

¶2

Dillip Kumar Mallik

¶3

….. Petitioner

¶4

Mr. H.S. Mishra, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

1. Basumati Budek @ Mallik ….. Opp. Parties 2. Sibashankar Mallik Mr. J. Behera, Advocate

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER 19.02.2026

¶9

Order No.

¶10

(Through hybrid Mode)

¶11

10.

¶12

This CRLMC has been filed challenging the order dated 29.08.2016 passed in CMC No. 01 of 2005 by the learned SDJM, Patnagarh (Annexure-2) directing for payment of Rs.500/- per month to his wife (Opposite Party No.1) and a sum of Rs.1,000/- to his son (Opposite Party No.2) from the date of filing of the Misc. Case, i.e. on 03.01.2005 and order dated 07.10.2016 passed in Criminal Revision No. 07 of 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patnagarh (Annexure-3) partly allowing the Revision and directing for payment of maintenance of Rs.1,000/- per month to the son Sibashankar Mallick only.

¶13

Notice of this application had been issued on 06.02.2023 for the first time to this Opposite Parties. Thereafter, the matter had been listed on 06.03.2023, 15.03.2023 and 26.06.2024. As it appears no interim order has been passed in this CRLMC.

¶14

Mr. H.S. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has not been able to contact the petitioner over telephone

¶15

Page 1 of 2

¶16

numbers provided by him.

¶17

Mr. J. Behera, learned counsel who is appearing on behalf of the Opposite Parties is also not in a position to inform this Court whether the impugned orders have been complied with.

¶18

Since the original maintenance order passed by the learned SDJM, Patnagarh has been passed on 29.08.2016 and more than 9 years have elapsed in the meanwhile and no interim order had been passed in this Court, I am not inclined to keep this case pending any further.

¶19

The CRLMC is accordingly disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner for revival of the CRLMC in case the cause of action still survives.

¶20

Subhalaxmi

¶21

Signature Not Verified

¶22

Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHALAXMI PRIYADARSHANI SAHOO Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 20-Feb-2026 19:04:54

¶23

Page 2 of 2

Dillip Ku.Mallik v. Basumati Bidek@Mallik

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dillip Ku.Mallik v. Basumati Bidek@Mallik

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shibasis Smrutiranjan Mohapatra Vs State of Odisha

Padmanava Hota Vs State of Odisha

Soudamini Nayak Vs State of Odisha

Pramodini Mallick Vs State of Odisha

Chittaranjan Sahani Vs State of Odisha

Chita Kumbhar@Chitta Ranjan Kumbhar Vs State of Orissa