Rashmi Ranjan Sethy v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-line order in a contempt petition recording that the judgment was pronounced in open court; no decision, reasoning or outcome appears in the text.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTR No.4 of 2025
Rashmi Ranjan Sethy …. Petitioners and others
Ms. M. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and …. Opposite Parties/ others Contemnors
Mr. P.K. Ray, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
12.06.2026
Order No.
06. 1. The judgment is pronounced in the open Court and kept in separate sheets.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rashmi Ranjan Sethy
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
V. Narasingh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court