CMS No. 43 of 2017 dismissed as petitioner did not seek substitution following deaths of legal heirs despite multiple orders mandating the same while challenging lower court execution order.
Complaint dismissed and Misc. Case No. 43 of 2017 disposed of without substantive examination of objections to attachment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 36 of 2017 CNR NO. -ODHC010447072017
Tribikram Padhi
…. Petitioners
Mr. A. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
1.Satyabati Purohit 2.Gajanan Padhi
…. Opp. Parties
None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER
Order No.
10.09.2026
08.
(Through hybrid Mode)
Page 1 of 2
had submitted that the legal heirs of the Petitioner had expired and for which the matter had been adjourned for taking steps for substitution. It appears that in spite of order dated 20.12.2017, 10.01.2018, 29.01.2018 and 13.02.2018, steps for substitution of the Petitioner has not been taken.
(Savitri Ratho) Judge
Subhalaxmi
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHALAXMI PRIYADARSHANI SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 10-Sep-2026 20:02:25
Page 2 of 2
Tribikram Padhi
Satyabati Purohit
Gajanan Padhi
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
