This is a bail application dismissed for non-prosecution. The petitioner was absent, and the court noted the suppression of material facts regarding five criminal antecedents, relying on Munnesh.
Bail application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No. 7532 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010549172026
Padma @ Padmalaya Tandi
… Petitioner None
-versus-
State of Odisha
… Opposite Party
Mr. T.K. Acharya, Addl. PP
CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER(ORAL)
Order No. 01.
10.09.2026
“9. since the petitioner has suppressed material facts with regard to his involvement in criminal cases, he is not entitled to the discretionary relief of bail .” Xxxx xxx xx xx.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: PRIYAJIT SAHOO Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 10-Sep-2026 19:59:13 priyajit
(G. Satapathy) Judge
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted where the petitioner has suppressed material facts regarding criminal antecedents.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Munnesh Vrs. State of Uttar PradeshApplied¶12
Munnesh Vrs. State of Uttar Pradesh; (2025) SCC OnLine SC 1319 · Who else cites this
Padma @ Padmalaya Tandi
State of Odisha
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
