Bikash Dalabehera @ Bikash Kumar Dalabehera Vs State of Odisha

The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS, has been filed by the Petitioner for regular bail relating to Bharatpur P.S. Case No.183 of 2024, corresponding to C.T. Case No.536 of 2024, pending before the learned J.M.F.C. (Cog. Taking-V), Bhubaneswar, for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 341, 294, 323, 324, 325, 420, 307, 379, 34 of IPC.

¶16

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner is in custody since 22.04.2026. He further contended that in the meantime the investigation has been completed and the final charge-sheet has been filed. He further contended that the

¶17

Page 1 of 3.

¶18

Petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further contended that the injured has sustained simple injury. He further contended that the Petitioner belongs to the locality, therefore, there is no chance of his absconding. He further submitted that the Petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent. He further submitted that the co-accused person has already been released on bail. In such view of the matter, learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that the Petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any terms and conditions deemed fit and proper by this Court in the facts and circumstances of the case.

¶19

Learned counsel for the State on the other hand opposed the bail application of the Petitioner on the ground of gravity and seriousness. In such view of the matter, he submitted that the bail application of the Petitioner be rejected at this juncture.

¶20

Having heard the learned counsels appearing for the respective parties and on a careful examination of the surrounding facts and circumstances of the present case, further keeping in view the period of detention of the Petitioner in jail custody, and the fact that the Petitioner belongs to the locality and that he does not have any criminal antecedent, and the fact that the investigation has been completed and the final charge-sheet has been filed in the meantime, and the fact that the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail in the meantime, this Court is inclined to release the Petitioner on bail subject to the Petitioner furnishing bail bond of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned court in seisin over the matter. The release of the Petitioner shall also be subject to such other terms and

¶21

Page 2 of 3.

¶22

conditions as is deemed just and proper by the court in seisin over the matter. Violation of any of the terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

¶23

It is further directed that the bail granted to the Petitioner be subject to the condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the Petitioner. In the event the Petitioner is having any criminal antecedents, then this bail order shall automatically stand revoked.

¶24

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

¶25

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

¶26

( Aditya Kumar Mohapatra ) Vacation Judge

¶27

S.K. Rout

¶28

Signature Not Verified

¶29

Digitally Signed Page 3 of 3. Signed by: SANTANU KUMAR ROUT Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 20-Jun-2026 16:58:35

Bikash Dalabehera @ Bikash Kumar Dalabehera v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bikash Dalabehera @ Bikash Kumar Dalabehera v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Sahoo Vs State of Odisha

Ashok Mahalik Vs State of Odisha

Kamala Naik Vs State of Odisha

Rakesh Prasad Vs State of Odisha

Sonu Pandey @ Panday Vs State of Odisha

Satyaban Majhi @ Sipun Vs State of Odisha