Panchaya Nayak Vs State of Odisha

This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Kishorenagar PS Case No.168 of 2024 corresponding to Special (POCSO) Case No.40 of 2024 pending in the file of learned ADJ-cum-Special Court under POCSO Act, Angul, for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.376(2)(n)/417/294/506 of IPC r/w Section 6 of POCSO Act, on the main allegation of committing rape and aggravated penetrative sexual assault upon the victim.

¶15

Heard, Mr. Kedarnath Sahoo, learned counsel appearing virtually for the petitioner; Mr. P. Satpathy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. Binayak Goduka, learned counsel appearing virtually for the victim in the matter and perused the record.

¶16

After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of

¶17

Page 1 of 3

¶18

the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the pre-trial detention of the petitioner in custody since 14.11.2025 with submission of charge-sheet in the meantime and taking into account the other circumstances on record in entirety including the statement of the victim and keeping in view the inherent right of the accused-petitioner to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial, this Court without expressing any view on merits admits the petitioner to bail.

¶19

Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) only with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following conditions:-

¶20

(i) the petitioner shall not contact the victim in any way or in any manner and he shall not visit to the house or place of residence of the victim till disposal of the case,

¶21

(ii) the petitioner shall not threaten, induce, influence or coerce any of the witnesses including the family members of the victim acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts before the Court &

¶22

(iii) the petitioner shall not follow the victim or loiter in or around her at any place in any manner.

¶23

Page 2 of 3

¶24

This Court, however, reserves liberty to the informant and the State to file appropriate application for cancellation of bail, if any of the conditions are violated or a case for cancellation of bail is otherwise made out. It is made clear that in such event for being approached for cancellation of bail, the learned trial Court would be at liberty to pass appropriate order in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

¶25

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e- mail for reference.

¶26

(G. Satapathy) Judge

¶27

Subhasmita

¶28

Signature Not Verified

¶29

Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA DAS Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 27-Jul-2026 20:19:53

¶30

Page 3 of 3

Panchaya Nayak v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Panchaya Nayak v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narendra Bhatra Vs State of Odisha

Deepak Behera Vs State of Odisha

Santosh Behera Vs State of Odisha

Mahesh Goud @ Maheswar Hati Vs State of Odisha

Narayan Sahoo Vs State of Odisha

Soumya Ranjan Samantaray Vs State of Odisha