The High Court of Orissa disposed of a pre-arrest bail application. The State invoked coercive provisions under Section 35(3) of BNSS (2023), eliminating the threat of arrest. Consequently, the application was disposed of without granting bail.
The pre-arrest bail application (ABLAPL) was disposed of; bail was not granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.8777 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010543842026
1. Rasid Mohmmad @ Md. Rasid
2. Aslam Mohammad
3. Kanija Bibi
Mr.J. Behera, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
Mr.C.R. Swain, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER
09.09.2026
Order No.
02. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
Page 1 of 2
provisions as contained in Section 35(3) of BNSS, 2023.
(V. NARASINGH) Judge
Basu
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BASUDEV NAYAK Designation: ADDL. DY. REGISTRAR-CUM-ADDL. PRINCIPAL SECY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK Date: 12-Sep-2026 16:57:19
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in view of the invocation of coercive provisions by the State.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rasid Mohmmad @ Md. Rasid
Aslam Mohammad
Kanija Bibi
State of Odisha
V. Narasinh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
