The court recounted an anticipatory bail application finding no reasonable apprehension of arrest based on the tribunal of principles laid down by the apex court. Liberty was granted to renew the prayer.
Liberty granted to Petitioner to renew the prayer if there is any fresh cause of action to apprehend arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 10341 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010663192026
Sk. Asiruddin Petitioner
Mr. P.C. Jena, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER 10.09.2026
Order No.
01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Page 1 of 2
S. Mulchandani & Ors. reported in ( 2024) 10 SCC 336, there is any reasonable apprehension of arrest of the Petitioner.
(V. NARASINGH)
Ayesha
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: AYESHA ROUT Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 12-Sep-2026 13:53:54
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there is reasonable apprehension of arrest for the petitioner under principles laid down in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia.
Whether a fresh cause of action for arrest is alleged.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia & Others Vrs. State of PunjabReferred¶12
(1980) 2 SCC 565 · Who else cites this
Dhanraj Aswani vs. Amar S. Mulchandani & Ors.Referred¶12
(2024) 10 SCC 336 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sk. Asiruddin
State of Odisha
V. Narasimh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
