In an application filed by the petitioner, a learned counsel stated that the application is no longer to be pressed as the petitioner has been taken into custody. The court accordingly disposed of the application as not-pressed.
Application disposed of as not-pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.10319 of 2026
CNR No.ODHC010677982026
Panchanan Senapati
…. Petitioner
Mr.S.N.Mishra-4, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr.A.K. Pati, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER
10.09.2026 Order No.
01. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner does not want to press this application since in the meanwhile, the Petitioner is stated to have been taken into custody.
Basu
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BASUDEV NAYAK Designation: ADDL. DY. REGISTRAR-CUM-ADDL. PRINCIPAL SECY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK Date: 12-Sep-2026 17:15:44
Page 1 of 1
Panchanan Senapati
State of Odisha
V. Narasimha
Basudev Nayak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
