The High Court of Orissa disposed of a petition seeking pre-arrest bail. The court held that since Section 35(3) of BNSS was invoked and there was no imminent threat of arrest, the application was disposed of without granting bail.
No bail granted; the petition under ABLAPL No.10305 of 2026 is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.10305 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010681132026
Ramjan Khan … Petitioner
Mr. Sk. K. Uddin, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opposite Party
Mr. U. C. Jena, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER
10.09.2026
Order No.
01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Page 1 of 2
(V. NARASINGH) Judge
Jina
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: JINA DIGAL Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 12-Sep-2026 12:03:11
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether pre-arrest bail should be granted when Section 35(3) of BNSS has been resorted to by the Investigating Agency and no imminent threat of arrest exists.
Whether the ABLAPL stand disposed of in view of the submission regarding absence of imminent threat of arrest.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ramjan Khan
State of Orissa
V. Narasinh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
