Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Aryan Das Vs State of Odisha — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2026)

Home
Orissa HC
2026
Aryan Das Vs State of OdishaAryan Das v. State of Odisha

Disposed

Aryan Das v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC10 Sept 2026ABLAPL/10281/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners voluntarily withdrew the filed ABLAPL, which the court accordingly disposed of as not pressed.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 10281 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010661222026

1. Aryan Das Petitioners

….

2. Amit Kumar Nayak

Mr. S.N. Panigrahi, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

…. Opposite Party

Mr. S.S. Routray, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER

10.09.2026

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Aryan Das
petitioner
Amit Kumar Nayak
respondent
State of Odisha

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 10 Sept 2026 · September
Registered: 2 Sept 2026
Case no.: ABLAPL/10281/2026

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

Cite this judgement

Aryan Das v. State of Odisha, ABLAPL/10281/2026 (OD), decided on 10 September 2026.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

V. Narasingham

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Disposed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The petitioner filed an ABLAPL but later expressed no desire to press it. The learned counsel's stance was noted, recorded, and the application was disposed of as not pressed without further direction.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Order No.

01. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that he does not want to press this ABLAPL. Memo filed to the said effect is taken on record.

Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of as not pressed.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge

Santoshi

Signature Not Verified

Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 12-Sep-2026 15:01:09

Page 1 of 1

V. Narasingham

CNR

ODHC010661222026

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Disposal

Not Pressed