Disposed¶22

Aswini Kumar Pattnayak v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC6 Mar 2025WP(C)/6243/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Aswini Kumar Pattnayak v. State of Odisha & Others, W.P.(C) No. 6243 of 2025, Orissa High Court (S.K. Sahoo & Savitri Ratho, JJ.), order dated 06.03.2025 — writ petition concerning Mutation Case No. 4312/2024 (Tahasildar, Soro), writ of prohibition, Supreme Court direction in Civil Appeal No. 7729/2009 dtd. 15.12.2015, Govt. circulars of 1988/1990/2016 — disposed of as withdrawn on counsel's request; no merits adjudicated; useful only for procedural citation.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law; petition disposed of as withdrawn. ¶22

Aswini Kumar Pattnayak Vs State of Odisha — Orissa HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 6243 of 2025

¶2

Aswini Kumar Pattnayak

¶3

….. Petitioner Mr. S.B. Mohanty, Advocate

¶4

-versus-

¶5

State of Odisha & Others

¶6

….. Opp. Parties Mr. Debasish Nayak, A.G.A.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

¶9

ORDER

¶10

06.03.2025

¶11

Order No. This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video 01. conferencing/physical mode).

¶12

This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:

¶13

“It is therefore prayed that, this Hon’ble Court may

¶14

graciously be pleased :-

¶15

(i) To admit the writ petition. (ii) To quash the Mutation case No. 4312/2024 under the Writ of Prohibition (initiated by the Tahasildar, Soro) which is not maintainable in view of Govt. circular dtd. 18.11.1988 and consequential Board of Revenue Instruction dtd. 25.4.1990 and clarificatory letter of the Govt. dtd. 20.12.2016.

¶16

(iii) To direct the Opposite Parties to confirm the earlier settlement of the Schedule land as recorded in favour of the petitioner by the implying direction of the Supreme Court dtd. 15.12.2015 passed in Civil Appeal

¶17

Page 1 of 2

¶18

No. 7729/2009 and clarificatory letter of the Govt. dtd. 26.12.2016 and the petitioner’s right and possession over the schedule land be protected.

¶19

And may pass any other order / orders, direction/directions as deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.

¶20

And for which act of kindness the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.”

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Writ Petition to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

¶22

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

¶23

(S.K. Sahoo) Judge

¶24

(Savitri Ratho) Judge

¶25

Sukanta/Puspa

¶26

Signature Not Verified

¶27

Digitally Signed Signed by: SUKANTA KUMAR BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 08-Mar-2025 10:46:46

¶28

Page 2 of 2

Aswini Kumar Pattnayak v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aswini Kumar Pattnayak v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Padman Kumar Dalai @ Dalei Vs State of Odisha

Shashidhar Barik Vs State of Odisha

Sambhu Sing Vs State of Odisha

Sankar Kishan Vs Land Acquisition Officer, Talcher, Bimalagarh, Nbg Rail Link Project, Sundargarh.

Manoranjan Mishra Vs State of Odisha

Sukanta Kumar Jena Vs State of Odisha