Priyanka Mohanty v. Srikanta Kumar Mohanty
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as both parties were absent during the hearing and a prior mediation session.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.5226 of 2019
Priyanka Mohanty ….
Petitioner
None
-versus-
Srikanta Kumar Mohanty ….
Opposite Party
None
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER 09.09.2025
Order No. 04.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Learned Counsel for the parties are absent on call. 3. Earlier also, when the matter got listed on 30.07.2025 under the heading “For Referral to the Special Mediation Drive-Mediation For the Nation”, learned Counsel for the parties were found absent.
4. The mediation report dated 04.09.2025 at Flag P also indicates that both the parties were absent on the date fixed i.e. on 04.09.2025, before the Mediator.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(S. K. MISHRA) JUDGE
Mona
Signature Not Verified Mona
Digitally Signed Signed by: MONALISA SWAIN Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 11-Sep-2025 09:54:32
Priyanka Mohanty
Srikanta Kumar Mohanty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court