Writ petition disposed of as infructuous after the petitioner stated that his grievance had already been redressed during the pendency of the matter, rendering the prayer infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.26762 of 2025
Biplab Kumar Sahoo …. Petitioner(s) Mr. Rudra Narayan Parija, Adv.
-versus-
…. State of Odisha & Ors. Opposite Party(s) Mr. Debashish Nayak, AGA
CORAM:
HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI
Order ORDER
No. 21.11.2025
2 . Heard.
3 . During course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that prayer made in this Writ Petition has rendered infructuous as the grievance of the Petitioner has already been redressed in the meantime.
4 . In such view of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi)
Judge
Ayaskanta
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Oriss a Date: 25-Nov-2025 16:10:45
Page 1 of 1
Biplab Kumar Sahoo
State of Odisha & Ors.
Sanjeeb K Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
