Counsel for the petitioner argued briefly and then sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file it afresh with better particulars. Leave was granted and the High Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file it afresh with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.24826 of 2025
BKD Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., …. Petitioner Keonjhar
Mr. Atul Tripathy, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. Saswat Das, Addl. Govt. Advocate Mr. P.K. Parhi, DSGI along with Mr. J. Panda, CGC
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
Order No.
01.12.2025
01. 1. Mr. Atul Tripathy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant writ petition with a liberty to file it afresh with better particulars. A memo in this regard has been filed in the Court, which is taken on record.
2. Leave is granted.
3. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
(Harish Tandon) Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman)
Judge
Signature Not Verified Sisira
Digitally Signed Signed by: SISIRA KUMAR BEHERA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 01-Dec-2025 18:09:32
BKD Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
State of Odisha and others
Harish Tandon
Murahari Sri Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
