Writ petition disposed of as infructuous after parties amicably resolved their disputes during pendency; the interim order of 23.09.2022 in I.A. No.13098 of 2022 was vacated and the court below was informed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.24757 of 2022
Arijit Nayak
…. Petitioner
Mr. S. Rath, Adv.
-versus-
Akankshya Sahu
…. Opposite Party
Mr. M. Sahoo, Adv.
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
05.12.2025
Order No.
03.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. It is submitted at the Bar that, during pendency of the present writ petition, the parties have resolved their disputes and differences amicably and the writ petition has become infructuous. A memo to the said effect is filed by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner in the Court, which be kept on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
4. Interim order dated 23.09.2022 passed in I.A. No.13098 of 2022 stands vacated.
5. Office is directed to communicate a copy of this order to the learned Court below for information and necessary action.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MONALISA SWAIN Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Mona Date: 06-Dec-2025 13:35:34
(S.K. Mishra)
Judge
Page 1 of 1
Arijit Nayak
Akankshya Sahu
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
