Dismissed¶15
Kamal Lochan Pradhan v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCWP(C)/21245/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Short Orissa High Court order dismissing a writ petition for non-prosecution owing to counsel's lack of instructions. Case: WP(C) No.21245 of 2017, Kamal Lochan Pradhan and Ors. (petitioners, adv. M/s.banshidhar Baug) v. State of Odisha and Ors. (opposite parties, advs. M/s Debasis Tripathy, G.senapati, M/s J.r.dash, R.k.sahoo, K.l.dash, P.n.sahoo, Smt. J. Sahoo ASC). Bench: Ananda Chandra Behera, J. Decision date: 10.12.2025. Matter taken up in hybrid mode; no statutory provisions, precedents, issues of law, or monetary amounts involved.
What did the court decide?
As learned counsel for the petitioners has no instruction to prosecute the writ petition, the writ petition is dismissed and disposed of finally for non-prosecution from the side of the petitioners. ¶15