Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Raghunath Vs Asst.D.M.,Ganjam — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2025)

Home
Orissa HC
2025
Raghunath Vs Asst.D.M.,GanjamRaghunath v. Asst.D.M.,Ganjam

Dismissed

Raghunath v. Asst.D.M.,Ganjam

Orissa HC10 Dec 2025OJC/12829/1997

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as no petitioner appeared on the hearing date or previously; no substantive issue was considered.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

O.J.C No.12829 of 1997

Raghunath Panda & Ors.

Petitioners

None

-versus-

Asst. District Magistrate, Ganjam & Ors.

…. Opposite Parties

Mr. S.K. Acharya, Adv. appearing on behalf

of Mr. R.C. Rath, Advocate

CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Raghunath Panda & Ors.
respondent
Asst. District Magistrate, Ganjam & Ors.

Coram

AI extract

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 10 Dec 2025 · December
Registered: 8 Sept 1997
Case no.: OJC/12829/1997

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

M/S.Apple Industries Vs M/S.Orissa Ind.
9 Dec 2025
Instalment Supply Vs M/S.Orissa Indust.
9 Dec 2025
Susil Vs Bpr.Dev.Authority
9 Dec 2025
Muralidhar Das Vs State of Orissa
10 Dec 2025

Cite this judgement

Raghunath v. Asst.D.M.,Ganjam, OJC/12829/1997 (OD), decided on 10 December 2025.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Dismissal for non-prosecution only. No petitioner or counsel appeared when the writ petition was taken up (nor on the prior date), so the court dismissed the matter for non-prosecution. Nothing of general legal application is decided in this order.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Order No.

10.12.2025

07. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. None appeared for the Petitioners when the matter was taken up. None had also appeared on 08.12.2025.

3. Since nobody is there on behalf of the Petitioners, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)

Judge

Subrat

Signature Not Verified

Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CU TTACK Date: 11-Dec-2025 18:06:01

CNR

ODHC010011191997

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Disposal

Disposed Off

Strumech India Vs Foil Laminators

10 Dec 2025

Niranjan Negi Vs State of Orissa

10 Dec 2025