Disposed
Mukunda Munda v. State
Orissa HCJCRLA/22/2007
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Criminal appeal by a deceased appellant. A police report confirmed the appellant's death and no legal heir sought leave to continue the appeal within the prescribed period under section 394 CrPC (corresponding to section 435 BNSS), so the appeal abated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
JCRLA No.22 of 2007
¶3
Mukunda Munda
¶4
….. Appellant
¶5
Mr. Pradeep Ranjan Mishra, Advocate
¶6
-versus-
¶7
State of Odisha
¶8
.....
¶9
Respondent
¶10
Mr. P.S. Nayak Addl. Govt. Advocate
¶11
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
¶12
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Mukunda Munda
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
AI extract
S.K. Sahoo
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court