Single judge disposed of a revision petition filed to challenge an impugned order, ruling the matter infructuous and consequently dismissing the petition.
Revision petition dismissed as the matter has become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLREV No. 500 of 2025
Kalpalata Nayak
…. Petitioner
Mr. B. Tripathy, Advocate
-Versus-
Jyotsnarani Sahoo
…. Opposite Party
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER
Order No.
03.09.2025
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: KABITARANI MAJHI Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 06-Sep-2025 13:11:58
(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
kabita
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision challenging the impugned order constitutes infructuous matter.
Kalpalata Nayak
Jyotsnarani Sahoo
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
