Petitioners sought quashing of criminal proceedings and cognizance order under section 482 Cr.P.C., citing compromise talks. Informant objected that no compromise was underway. The court held stalling proceedings at this stage would be an abuse of process and disposed of the application with liberty to re-approach at a later stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.1763 of 2025
1) Krushna Chandra Choudhury@ Tukuna 2) Rabindra Sahu
..... Appellants
Represented By Adv. - Jyotirmaya Sahoo
-versus-
1) State Of Odisha
..... Respondents
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
ORDER 13.08.2025
Order No.
Page 1 of 2.
( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge
RKS
Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 2.
Digitally Signed Signed by: RAMESH KUMAR SINGH Designation: AR-CUM-Senior Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 18-Aug-2025 16:15:22
1 issue framed by the court
Should the criminal proceeding in G.R. Case No. 946 of 2024 be quashed at this stage given ongoing compromise talks?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Krushna Chandra Choudhury @ Tukuna
Rabindra Sahu
State of Odisha
Simanchala Sethi
Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
