Pramodini Choudhury v. Krushna Chandra Pratihari
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the CMP; the court granted permission and disposed of the matter as withdrawn. No substantive issue was decided.
Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the CMP; the court granted permission and disposed of the matter as withdrawn. No substantive issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP No. 427 of 2022
Pramodini `…. Petitioner Choudhury Represented by Mr. S.N.Mishra, Advocate
-Versus -
Krushna Chandra …. Opposite Party Pratihari Represented by AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
Order No. 01.
19.06.2025
( Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
Deepak
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: DEEPAK PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC,Cuttack Date: 20-Jun-2025 15:43:43
Page 1 of 1
Pramodini Choudhury
Krushna Chandra Pratihari
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court