Bail applications under Section 483 BNSS by two accused in an NDPS case alleging transport of 600 kg ganja. The Court held the commercial quantity and one petitioner's prior similar case meant Section 37 conditions were not satisfied and rejected both bail applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
Raghu Muduli (In BLAPL No.221 of 2025) Shyama Khilla (In BLAPL No.306 of 2025) … Petitioners
Mr. A.K. Jena, Advocate (in BLAPL No.221 of 2025) Mr. S.K. Nayak, Advocate (in BLAPL No.306 of 2025) -versus-
State of Odisha
Opposite Party
Mr. P. Satpathy, Addl. PP
CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER(ORAL)
Order No.
07.
11.08.2025
Page 1 of 3
allegation of transporting 600Kgs of Contraband Ganja in the tractor of the petitioner-Raghu Muduli. 4. Heard, Mr. Asit Kumar Jena, learned counsel for the petitioner in BLAPL No. 221 of 2025, Mr. Suchit Kumar Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner in BLAPL No. 306 of 2025 and Mr. P. Satpathy, learned Addl. PP in the matter and perused the record.
Page 2 of 3
(G. Satapathy)
Judge
S.Sasmal
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA SASMAL Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 12-Aug-2025 13:56:59
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail under Section 483 BNSS in an NDPS case involving seizure of 600 kg ganja despite the bar under Section 37 NDPS Act.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Raghu Muduli (In BLAPL No.221 of 2025)
Shyama Khilla (In BLAPL No.306 of 2025)
State of Odisha
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
