Bhimasen Majhi @ Bhima Vs State of Odisha — Orissa HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Bhimasen Majhi @ Bhima Vs State of Odisha — Orissa HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Rectification of typographical errors in the order dated 06.05.2025 in BLAPL No.2162 of 2025: cause-title counsel name to be read as 'Mr. Pranaya Kumar Dash, Advocate'; paragraph 3 to be read with the corrected case particulars and offence provisions; all other parts of the earlier order unaltered.

Issue for consideration

Whether the order dated 06.05.2025 in BLAPL No.2162 of 2025 contains typographical errors - in paragraph 3 (case particulars and offence provisions) and in the cause title (name of counsel for the Petitioner) - requiring rectification.

Court's answer

The name of the counsel for the Petitioner, wrongly reflected as 'Mr. Manas Chand, Advocate' in the cause title of the order dated 06.05.2025, shall be read as 'Mr. Pranaya Kumar Dash, Advocate' hereinafter.

Ratio / Principle

The contents wrongly reflected in paragraph 3 of the order dated 06.05.2025 shall be read as the corrected text recording the Petitioner's custody in Ramchandrapur P.S. Case No.338 of 2024 / G.R. (GN) Case No.677 of 2024 (Nyayadhikari Grama Nyayalaya, Ghasipura), the BNS 2023 offence sections, and his petition for release on bail.

Key takeaways

All other parts of the order dated 06.05.2025 in BLAPL No.2162 of 2025 remain unaltered.ratio¶18

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Orissa High Court at Cuttack (Dr. S.K. Panigrahi, J.), Order dated 15.05.2025 in BLAPL No.2162 of 2025 (Bhimasen Majhi @ Bhima v. State of Odisha): rectification of typographical errors in the Court's own order dated 06.05.2025, taken up through Special Notice though not listed. Held: (i) the name of the counsel for the Petitioner, wrongly reflected as 'Mr. Manas Chand, Advocate' in the cause title, is to be read as 'Mr. Pranaya Kumar Dash, Advocate'; (ii) paragraph 3 of the earlier order is to be read as stating that the Petitioner is in custody in Ramchandrapur P.S. Case No.338 of 2024, corresponding to G.R. (GN) Case No.677 of 2024, pending before the learned Nyayadhikari Grama Nyayalaya, Ghasipura (NGN), registered for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 296, 76, 303(2), 109, 324(4), 324(5) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, and has filed the petition for his release on bail; (iii) all other parts of the order dated 06.05.2025 remain unaltered. This correction order records no substantive decision on the bail prayer itself.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: BHABAGRAHI JHANKAR Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 15-May-2025 18:51:18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.2162 of 2025

Bhimasen Majhi @ Bhima …. Petitioner (s)

Mr. Pranaya Kumar Dash, Adv. -versus-

…. State of Odisha Opposite Party (s) Mr. Sonak Mishra ASC Mr. Manas Chand, Adv. (for Informant)

CORAM:

DR.JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

Order No. ORDER

02. 15.05.2025

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2. Though this matter was not listed today, for rectification/ correction of some typographical error in the order dated 06.05.2025, the same is taken up through Special Notice.

3. It appears from the order dated 06.05.2025 passed in BLAPL No.2162 of 2025 that the contents of paragraph 3 of the aforesaid have wrongly been reflected instead of “ The Petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Ramchandrapur P.S. Case No.338 of 2024, corresponding to G.R. (GN) Case No.677 of 2024, pending in the court of the learned Nyayadhikari Grama Nyayalaya, Ghasipura (NGN), registered for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 296, 76, 303(2), 109, 324(4), 324(5) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, has filed this petition for his release on bail ”. Further, the name of the counsel for the Petitioner in the cause title of the aforesaid order has wrongly

Page 1 of 2

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: BHABAGRAHI JHANKAR Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 15-May-2025 18:51:18

been reflected as “Mr. Manas Chand, Advocate” instead of “Mr. Pranaya Kumar Dash, Advocate”.

4. Hence, the name of the counsel for the Petitioner wrongly reflected as “Mr. Manas Chand, Advocate” in the cause title of the aforesaid order be read as “Mr. Pranaya Kumar Dash, Advocate” hereinafter. Further, the contents wrongly reflected in paragraph 3 of the aforesaid order be read as follows:

“3. The Petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Ramchandrapur P.S. Case No.338 of 2024, corresponding to G.R. (GN) Case No.677 of 2024, pending in the court of the learned Nyayadhikari Grama Nyayalaya, Ghasipura (NGN), registered for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 296, 76, 303(2), 109, 324(4), 324(5) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, has filed this petition for his release on bail ”

5. All other parts of the aforesaid order remain unaltered.

(Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge

B. Jhankar

Page 2 of 2