Habeas-type writ petition by father regarding his adult son. State reported the son had gone with his love interest to police station and both recorded statements under section 164 CrPC. In view of this, the court made no further order and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPCRL No.40 of 2024
Premananda Rout
.....
Petitioner
Represent e d By Adv. – Mr. P. Moha n ty, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
.....
Opposite Parties
Represent e d By Adv. – Mr. A.K. N anda, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
09.05.2024
Order No.
02. 1. Mr. Na n da, learned advocate, Additional G overnment
Advocate appe a rs on behalf of State and hands up hi s instruction
dated 1st May, 2024. He submits, petitioner’s son is a n adult. He went, with his l ove interest, to Khandapada PS on 29th A pril, 2024.
Subsequent th e reto, he and his love interest rec o rded their respective stat e ments, inter alia, under section 164 in Code of
Criminal Proce d ure, 1973.
Page 1 of 2
petition is disp o sed of.
(Arindam Sinha) Judge
(M.S. Sahoo) Judge
Jyoti
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 09-May-2024 16:54:41
Page 2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Premananda Rout
State of Odisha and others
Arindam Sinha
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
