M/S.Iot Utkal Energy Services Ltd. v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Administrative order correcting a typographical error in the record of appearance in a previously dismissed writ petition, substituting one advocate's name for another. No substantive issue decided.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.9751 of 2018
M/s. Iot Utkal Energy Services Ltd.
…. Petitioner
Represented By Adv. – Mr. Iswar Mohanty, Advocate Mr. V. Sridharan, Senior Advocate
-versus-
Union of India and another
…. Opposite Parties
Represented By Adv. –
Mr. P.K. Parhi, Dy. Solicitor General Mr. B. Moharana, CGC Mr. A. Kedia, Junior Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s. Iot Utkal Energy Services Ltd.
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
Arindam Sinha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court