A petitioner alleging forcible occupation of his property sought disposal of representations filed with authorities. The Court declined to entertain the writ petition, granting liberty to pursue remedy before the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.8178 of 2024
Rama Chandra Mohapatra @ Patra ….. Petitioner
Mr. P.R. Sutar, Advocate
Vs.
….. State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties
Mr. B. Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER 03.05.2024
Order No.
02.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA DAS Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Subhasmita Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 06-May-2024 17:39:00
(G. SATAPATHY) JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should direct the Opposite Parties to consider the petitioner's representation regarding alleged forcible occupation of his property.
Rama Chandra Mohapatra @ Patra
State of Odisha and others
B.R. Sarangi
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
