One-line dismissal order in a writ petition against Utkal University; no reasons or proposition of law stated beyond holding that the petition lacked merit and that the petitioner's hardship was attributable to his own actions. Interim orders, if any, were vacated.
Writ petition dismissed; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 6491 of 2014
…. Trailokyanath Parida
Petitioner(s)
Mr. Ranjan Kumar Rout, Adv.
-versus-
Vice Chancellor, Utkal …. Opp. Party(s) University and others
Mr. T. Pattanayak, Adv.
CORAM:
Order
No.
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI ORDER
09.10.2024
1 . This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
2 . Learned counsel for the parties are present. Judgment prepared in separate sheets is delivered and pronounced in open Court in the presence of learned counsel for the parties and the order is passed accordingly as follows:
3 . Therefore, the present Writ Petition lacks merit and is, accordingly, dismissed. The mental distress and other hardships experienced by the Petitioner are attributable to his own actions .
4. Interim order, if any, passed earlier stands vacated.
( Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge
B.Jhankar
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BHABAGRAHI JHANKAR Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUT TACK Date: 21-Oct-2024 15:22:31
Page 1 of 1
Trailokyanath Parida
Vice Chancellor, Utkal University
S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
