A writ petition that had become infructuous with the passage of time; the petitioner's counsel so stated and the court disposed of the petition as infructuous without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 6469 of 2016
Dr. Upendra Sahoo
Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Das, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. S. Pattnaik, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
21.02.2024
Order No.
10. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that by efflux of
time the matter has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as
infructuous.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Santoshi
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANTOSHI LENKA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 22-Feb-2024 17:56:18
Page 1 of 1
Dr. Upendra Sahoo
State of Odisha and others
V. Narasingh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
