Widow claiming possession of schedule land since 2005 encroachment proceeding sought restraint on eviction and settlement. Court directed that before eviction a fifteen days notice be served, objections considered per the OPLE Act, and status quo maintained meanwhile.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.5991 of 2024
Pramila Nayak …. Petitioner
Mr. B.B. Mishra, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha & others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. D.K. Behera, ASC
CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
Order No.
15.03.2024
Page 1 of 2
required to be served on the petitioner for a response from her side since long possession for more than thirty years is claimed with settlement of the schedule land in terms of the provisions of the OPLE Act.
6. Hence, it is ordered.
time, to maintain status quo in respect of the schedule land.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BALARAM BEHERA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 16-Mar-2024 13:19:23
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tahasildar could evict the petitioner from the schedule land without notice despite her long possession claimed under the OPLE Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pramila Nayak
State of Odisha
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
