Petitioners filed a memo in the writ petition stating they did not wish to press the application and sought permission to withdraw. The High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.5167 of 2022
Anil Kumar Rana & …. Petitioners Others
Mr. B. Mohapatra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
09.12.2024 Order No.
04. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioners filed a memo in Court stating therein that Petitioners do not want to press this application and they may be permitted to withdraw the same. The memo be kept in record.
3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBRAT KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CU TTACK Date: 11-Dec-2024 16:37:32
Anil Kumar Rana & Others
State of Odisha
Others (Opposite Parties)
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
