This court disposed of a writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a better application. Counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed with liberty to file a better application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.4749 of 2022
Pradipta Kumar Samanta …. Petitioner
Mr. MD. Golam Madani, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and another
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. Sailaza Nandan Das, Addl. Standing Counsel CORAM:
Order No.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN ORDER 03.09.2024
This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
(M.S. Raman) Judge
Suchitra
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUCHITRA BEHERA Designation: JUNIOR STENOGRAPHER Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 03-Sep-2024 18:07:15
Page 1 of 1
Pradipta Kumar Samanta
State of Odisha
Murahari Sri Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
