The court declined to extend the status quo order for 60 days as requested, noting the urgency and the risk of eviction/demolition. Instead, a 15-day extension was granted to enable the petitioners to approach the civil court.
Extension of status quo order for 15 days from the date of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.4718 of 2024
Hara Mohan Jena & Another
Petitioners
Mr. S.K. Mallick, Advocate
-Versus-
The State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. P.K. Rout, AGA CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER
Order No.
22.03.2024 I.A. No.4116 of 2024
(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Signature Not Verified
Tudu Digitally Signed Signed by: THAKURDAS TUDU Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: OHC,CTC Date: 27-Mar-2024 17:13:08
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order of status quo in the writ petition should be extended for a period of 60 days to allow service of notice under Section 60 C.P.C.?
Hara Mohan Jena & Another
The State of Odisha & Others
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
