Writ petition against UCO Bank and others dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel was absent on two consecutive listings, with only the bank's counsel present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.4461 of 2012
Sangram Keshari Khuntia …. Petitioner
None
-versus-
UCO Bank & others …. Opposite Parties Mr. B.N. Udgata, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA ORDER Order No. 06.02.2024 05. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent on call. Mr. B.N. Udgata, learned Counsel for the Opposite PartyBank is present. 3. Earlier also when the matter got listed on 02.02.2024, learned Counsel for the Petitioner was found absent. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Order No.
Prasant
(S. K. Mishra) Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: PRASANT KUMAR PRADHAN Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 07-Feb-2024 12:52:17
Sangram Keshari Khuntia
UCO Bank
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
