Street vendor with an expired vending certificate sought relief; petition was disposed of as covered by the court's earlier order dated 12 February 2024 in W.P.(C) no. 35450 of 2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 4403 of 2024
(Through hybrid mode)
Bhagaban Raut ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv.Mr. D. Mohapatra, Advocate -versusState of Odisha and others ..... Opp.Parties Represented by Adv.Mr.A.K.Sharma, AGA for State Mr.B.Dash, Advocate for O.P. nos.2 & 3 Mr. A.Acharya, Advocate for O.P. no.4
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
07.05.2024
Order No.
02. 1. Mr. Mohapatra, learned advocate appears on behalf of
petitioner and submits, his client is a street vendor. He has, inter alia, street vending certificate, though expired. He submits further, his client’s prayer for relief is covered by order dated 12th
Page 1 of 2
February, 2024 made in W.P.(C) no. 35450 of 2022 ( Kedarnath Sahoo v. State of Odisha and others ).
2. Mr. Sharma, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State. Mr. Das, learned advocate appears on behalf of Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation (BMC) and Mr. Acharya, learned advocate, for opposite party no.4. None appears on behalf of opposite party no.3 in spite of good service.
3. The writ petition is disposed of as covered by said order dated 12th February, 2024 (supra).
(Arindam Sinha) Judge
(M.S. Sahoo) Judge
dutta/jyostna
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: AJIT KUMAR DUTTA Reason: Authentication Location: ohc Date: 08-May-2024 13:41:38
Page 2 of 2
Bhagaban Raut
State of Odisha
Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation (BMC)
Arindam Sinha
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
