Krushna Ch.Sahani v. Collector,Bhadrak
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was disposed of as it was filed in want of instruction by the petitioner. Only a memo of withdrawal was recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.4372 of 2015
Krushna Chandra Sahani
…. Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Das, Advocate
-versus-
Collector, Bhadrak & Ors.
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. B. Panigrahi, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Order No.
10.
ORDER
25.01.2024
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner is present and files a
memo for withdrawal of the writ petition on the ground of lack of
instruction. The same be kept on record.
3. In view of such submission, writ petition stands disposed of
due to want of instruction.
(S.K. MISHRA)
JUDGE
Banita
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BANITA PRIYADARSHINI PALEI Designation: SR. STENOGRAPHER Reason: AUTHENTICATION Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 26-Jan-2024 15:43:10
Page 1 of 1
Krushna Chandra Sahani
Collector, Bhadrak
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court