Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an interim order by the Sub-Collector that restrained parties from constructing on disputed case land pending a mutation appeal, finding no impropriety in the order.
Writ petition dismissed; interim order dated 12th October, 2023 remains in force restraining construction pending appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.37113 of 2023
Lalit Kuanrdar and Another …. Petitioners
Mr. A.K. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
Prashanta Pradhan & Others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. S. Ghose, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM: SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER
16.4.2024
Order No.
S. Ghose, learned AGA for State – Opposite Parties.
M.K. Panda
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MANAS KUMAR PANDA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 18-Apr-2024 14:44:53
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the interim order of the Sub-Collector restraining construction should be allowed.
Lalit Kuanrdar
Another
Prashanta Pradhan
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
